邦地(di)產 2016-01-21 12:30:49
大規(gui)模的農民工(gong)有了(le)購房(fang)資格和(he)購房(fang)條(tiao)件,對市(shi)場去庫存(cun)的拉動力將十分(fen)驚(jing)人(ren)。
每經編輯|吳若凡(fan)
(本(ben)文原載(zai)于微信公眾(zhong)號“邦地產”real-estate-circle)
春節還沒到(dao),國務院就給(gei)農民工送來了一份大禮!
2016年(nian)1月17日,國務院辦(ban)公(gong)廳下(xia)發(fa)了《關(guan)于(yu)全面治理(li)拖欠農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)問(wen)題的意見》,將(jiang)全面實行(xing)農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)“實名(ming)制(zhi)”管理(li)制(zhi)度(du),同時(shi)要求農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)由委(wei)(wei)托施(shi)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)總承(cheng)包(bao)企(qi)業(ye)直接代發(fa),分包(bao)企(qi)業(ye)負(fu)責為招(zhao)用(yong)(yong)的農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)申辦(ban)銀(yin)行(xing)個人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)賬戶并辦(ban)理(li)實名(ming)制(zhi)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)支付銀(yin)行(xing)卡,按(an)月考核農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)作量,并編制(zhi)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)支付表,經農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)本人簽字確認后,交施(shi)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)總承(cheng)包(bao)企(qi)業(ye)委(wei)(wei)托銀(yin)行(xing),通(tong)過其設立的農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(勞(lao)務費)專(zhuan)用(yong)(yong)賬戶,直接將(jiang)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)劃入(ru)農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)個人工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)賬戶。
這可是具有劃時代意義(yi)的管理辦法啊(a)!
要知道,以往農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)的(de)工(gong)(gong)資(zi),一(yi)般(ban)是(shi)(shi)(shi)由建筑公司(si)先把現金交到包工(gong)(gong)頭(tou)手里(工(gong)(gong)人班組是(shi)(shi)(shi)一(yi)周一(yi)結),然后再由包工(gong)(gong)頭(tou)分發(fa)工(gong)(gong)資(zi)給農(nong)民工(gong)(gong)。一(yi)些小(xiao)的(de)企業則(ze)可(ke)能(neng)是(shi)(shi)(shi)按(an)月發(fa)工(gong)(gong)資(zi),基本(ben)也都是(shi)(shi)(shi)現金的(de)形(xing)式。經過多個環節(jie),而(er)且(qie)是(shi)(shi)(shi)現金為主,這里面出現糾紛的(de)情況就太多了(le)。
但農(nong)民工的工資(zi)收入如果全面納入銀行(xing)代發體系(xi),農(nong)民工有(you)了工資(zi)卡,就(jiu)能(neng)每個月(yue)固定按時地(di)收到(dao)工資(zi),借(jie)用銀行(xing)體系(xi),也可以大大縮小欠薪缺薪少薪的風險。
而站在房地產角度,邦爺此刻也是心潮澎湃打,因為它帶來的一系列連鎖反應中,就有拉動樓市消費這一項,說這一政策是個去庫存的“王炸”也不為過。
銀行貸款曾是農民工面前的“大山”
要(yao)知道,原先銀行很多(duo)是(shi)拒絕(jue)放款給農(nong)民工群體的(de),因為其(qi)沒(mei)有(you)(you)穩(wen)定(ding)的(de)工資流(liu)水(shui)。2010年中國人民銀行頒布的(de)《個人住(zhu)房(fang)貸(dai)款管(guan)理辦法》(第(di)二章第(di)五條)就要(yao)求,借款人必須具備“有(you)(you)穩(wen)定(ding)的(de)職業和收入(ru),信用良好,有(you)(you)償還貸(dai)款本息(xi)的(de)能力(li)(li)”。獲取房(fang)貸(dai)也需(xu)要(yao)有(you)(you)長(chang)期穩(wen)定(ding)的(de)收入(ru)來源,并需(xu)要(yao)單位(wei)開具證明(ming)證實(shi)申請(qing)人的(de)償還能力(li)(li)。但無論(lun)哪一項,沒(mei)有(you)(you)穩(wen)定(ding)工作(zuo)與收入(ru)來源的(de)農(nong)民工,都顯然不(bu)被歸結在列。
其實對于銀(yin)行(xing)(xing)而言,放(fang)款(kuan)給(gei)沒有穩(wen)定的收入(ru)來源的借(jie)(jie)款(kuan)人,會增加壞(huai)賬率的風險,若等到借(jie)(jie)款(kuan)人無力償還(huan)貸款(kuan),銀(yin)行(xing)(xing)再拿借(jie)(jie)款(kuan)人的房子(zi)等資產折算、拍賣,那(nei)也是很費勁又毫無意義的。
而今,擋在農(nong)民工跟前的(de)這座大山已(yi)經開始松動(dong)。農(nong)民工穩定(ding)收入來源(yuan)的(de)問題得(de)到了根本解決。有了正常的(de)工資(zi)流水,這部分人群完全(quan)具備能力貸款的(de)。
2億“限貸”人群被激活,他們可以去這些城市買房
中國新城(cheng)鎮化的發展(zhan),要求(qiu)我國必(bi)須(xu)(xu)通過制度創新,來實現社會的公平與均衡發展(zhan)。必(bi)須(xu)(xu)加(jia)力發展(zhan)居住、就業、教育、醫療(liao)衛生、養(yang)老(lao)、低(di)收入補貼、失(shi)業救濟等,以提(ti)高農民(min)生活質量。
有(you)人直言,今天的城鎮化是為了(le)還農(nong)民過(guo)去的“賬”。
實際上,讓農(nong)民轉變身份(fen),讓近2億農(nong)民生活在城鎮,是具有深刻經(jing)濟觸動效益的。
大規模的(de)農民工(gong)有了(le)購房(fang)資格和購房(fang)條件,至少在房(fang)地產層面,他們對市場去庫存(cun)的(de)拉動力(li)就將十分驚(jing)人。
要(yao)知道(dao),“房(fang)地產去庫存(cun)”可是(shi)2016年(nian)(nian)我國經(jing)濟的(de)重要(yao)任務。在2015年(nian)(nian)年(nian)(nian)底召(zhao)開的(de)中央經(jing)濟工作會議上,中央就明確提出(chu)了(le)通過(guo)加快農民工市民化(hua),拉動(dong)庫存(cun)消化(hua)。此次《意見》的(de)出(chu)臺(tai),無疑是(shi)將這一既定任務落實到了(le)執行層面。
打通銀行信貸(dai)體(ti)系,農民工(gong)有了收(shou)入(ru)保(bao)證和買房(fang)基(ji)礎,他們可以在哪兒買房(fang)呢?
老家是一個(ge)很好的(de)(de)選(xuan)項,但如果(guo)想留在大城(cheng)市,以上海為(wei)例,其周邊(bian)城(cheng)市的(de)(de)房產其實也是不錯的(de)(de)選(xuan)項。比如嘉興、余杭(hang)、昆(kun)山(shan)、啟東,太倉,他們(men)的(de)(de)住宅均價(jia)在5000元/平左右(you),嘉興在6000元/平左右(you),都是農(nong)民工積蓄幾(ji)年可以下手的(de)(de)地方。
由此,一(yi)些專家所說,“農民工無(wu)(wu)力買(mai)房(fang),讓(rang)農民進城買(mai)房(fang)就會引發‘中(zhong)國版次貸危機’”,更被證明是無(wu)(wu)稽(ji)之談。
編輯:王婷(ting)婷(ting) 審(shen)(shen)核:楊(yang)羚強 終審(shen)(shen):蔡戰波
如需轉載請與《每日經濟新聞》報社聯系。
未經《每日經濟新聞(wen)》報社授權,嚴(yan)禁轉載或鏡像,違(wei)者必究。
讀者(zhe)熱(re)線:4008890008
特別提醒:如果我們使用了您的圖片,請作者與本站聯系索取(qu)稿酬。如您不希望作(zuo)品(pin)出現在本站,可聯系我們要求撤下您的作(zuo)品(pin)。
歡迎(ying)關注每(mei)日(ri)經濟新聞APP